IoT security is critical, hard, achievable: 3 best network practices

Reader Forum

The rapid adoption and deployment of IoT devices is a significant contributor to digital transformation. To compete in the new digital marketplace, organizations must monitor and manage critical network and system components in real time, and create algorithms to extract meaningful information from the Big Data these devices generate. There are many implications to adding dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of new devices to a network, not the least of which is security. The challenge is that IoT describes a wide range of devices and connectivity methods that many organizations may not be entirely prepared to secure and control. The insecurity of IoT devices 2017 has brought multiple massive cyberattacks that targeted IoT devices, such as Mirai, which used compromised IoT devices to create a massive botnet that was used to take down a huge section of the internet. The reason for this is that many IoT devices were never designed with security in mind. Many run on firmware that can’t be patched. An alarming number have had backdoors hardcoded into them. And many are clientless or headless, meaning they can’t be updated. The upshot is that as organizations are creating an IoT security strategy, they have to take into account that the devices themselves may be vulnerable. Two kinds of IoT IoT can be broadly broken down into two camps: consumer and commercial devices. Consumer IoT includes such things as TVs, DVRs, home security systems, appliances, lights, printers and watches, while commercial IoT comprises devices such as monitors, sensors, inventory tags, RF-enabled IDs, valves, switches and devices on the manufacturing floor. There are also hybrid segments being developed, such as IoMT (Internet of Medical Things), which includes things like patient monitors, infusion pumps and assessment tools. Companies are also developing IoT solutions for smart cities, such as street light controls, electric meter reading, emergency services coordination, traffic management and agricultural water monitoring. A combination of commercial and consumer devices are usually operating in today’s networks. These are often divided into consumer and consumer-like tools deployed in the IT network, and industrial solutions and tools deployed in production environments, as well as newly connected OT (Operations Technology) networks. While each comes with its own security implications, those connected to industrial control systems or critical infrastructure often require especially hardened and segmented security. Challenges in connectivity The devices themselves pose security risks, but the threat extends even further. IoT devices connect to the network in a variety of ways, and each requires unique security strategy. Wi-Fi: Many IoT devices use Wi-Fi to connect to the network. This is the connection method most folks think of when they think of IoT. That’s likely because this is how the IoT devices we are most familiar with, such as TVs and gaming and entertainment systems, connect to our networks at home. Wireless access points require integrated security in order to inspect traffic, as well as high performance in order to accommodate the increasing number of devices simultaneously connecting to the network. Wired, Wireless and Cloud: To connect to the network, mobile IoT devices use a variety of methods and protocols. Stationary IoT devices, such as HVAC, security systems, or things like printers are located inside the network perimeter and are often hard-wired directly into a network port. While the majority of security is currently deployed at the network edges and access points, devices and aggregators connected directly into a switch port or network hub often have free access to the internal network. Network controls and pervasive security strategies need to be employed to ensure that devices connecting to the network behind the firewall are secured and monitored. Bluetooth: However, many IoT devices use other methods to connect. Bluetooth-enabled devices, for example, connect through receivers plugged directly into the network. Securing these devices requires establishing and maintaining Bluetooth security protocols, security gateways such as firewalls deployed inside the network perimeter, and segmentation-based security to isolate IoT traffic from the rest of your network. RF Devices: There is another category of IoT devices that is RF-enabled and connect over low-power wireless personal area networks. This is especially the case for those deployed inside an OT network. These devices tend to use either IEEE 802.15.4e or Zigbee as their primary connection protocol and run across a wide variety of network standards, such as 6LoWPAN, ANT, DASH7, EnOcean, Insteon, ISA100.11a, MiWi, NeuRFon, WirelessHART, WiSUN, LoRaWAN, Sigfox and Z-Wave. The devices will vary in the type of data they collect and transmit, as well as their frequency of connection. Many of these devices can also be quite chatty, which can create additional challenges in terms of security overhead for securing large numbers of connections, managing simultaneous connections, and inspecting potentially high volumes of what can often be extra traffic. Peer-to-Peer and ad hoc networks: IoT devices connect not only to the network but, increasingly, to each other. Things like swarm technology and advances in AI can lead to devices creating their own ad hoc networks, allowing them to generate and deliver more robust data. It also means that an infection can spread quickly through an IoT network. Of course, since security can rarely be deployed directly onto these IoT devices, it is imperative that security is deployed at the network gateway to provide deep inspection to ensure that these devices haven’t been compromised or are being used to deliver a denial of service attack on your internal infrastructure. Securing IoT: three best practices It is a common practice for organizations with an IoT strategy to use multiple methods for connecting these devices to the network. To secure these IoT devices and networks — regardless of the connection methods —requires three things: Segmentation IoT devices and traffic constitute a clear and present danger to your organization. They need to be automatically identified at the point of access, segmented from the rest of the network, monitored and tracked along their data path, and inspected when they cross network zones for aggregation or analysis. Distributed Security The network perimeter is not dead, despite claims to the contrary. Instead, we now have a network of many edges, which means that traditional methods of security that employ an isolated security device at the network edge, or that direct all traffic through a single network security chokepoint, are no longer effective. Networks require high-performance wireless access points with integrated security, in addition to traditional security gateways, in order to protect and secure Wi-Fi access at scale. Hardware ports need to be hardened and monitored. Policies securing different RF access methods and protocols need to become part of your security strategy. Cloud security needs to see and safeguard IoT devices and traffic. And all of it needs to be part of a single, unified security strategy.  Integration, correlation and automation It is essential that you do not compromise security visibility as networks become increasingly elastic and distributed. Traditionally isolated security devices are no longer a viable option. Distributed security tools—whether in the cloud, at new access points or deployed deep in the network—need to be woven together into a holistic security fabric strategy. This architectural approach enables clear, end-to-end visibility, centralized management and orchestration, and the consistent distribution of coherent security policies. Devices that can see and share threat intelligence can then automatically coordinate a response to any detected threat. An approach like this enables security to extend across the network, no matter how much it expands and contracts. This security strategy is flexible and able to handle any additional new functions and ecosystems such as cloud environments or IoT networks and protocols.     Related

Read more...

Previous Article
CSO: KRACK: Researcher discovers flaws in WPA2 authentication
CSO: KRACK: Researcher discovers flaws in WPA2 authentication

The Key Reinstallation Attack (KRACK) centers on several key management vulnerabilities in WPA2, the go to ...

Next Article
Accenture left a huge trove of sensitive data on exposed servers
Accenture left a huge trove of sensitive data on exposed servers

(Image: file photo) Technology and cloud giant Accenture has confirmed it inadvertently left a massive stor...